[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: functions statically linked on x86_64 while i386 uses glibc function
Re: functions statically linked on x86_64 while i386 uses glibc functions
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:52:05 +0100
Andi Kleen <address@hidden> wrote:
> I was doing some binary size comparisons between -m32 and -m64 builds on
> Linux (SUSE 10.2 with gcc 4.1.2). This is the same build environment, same
> glibc, etc.
> just one configured for i386-linux and built with -m32 and the other for
> One thing I noticed is that a few executable sizes differ widely:
> (.text sizes) 64bit 32bit
> ./src/csplit 95481 27704
> ./src/nl 87879 19551
> ./src/ptx 98316 28623
> ./src/expr 88373 20731
> ./src/tac 83726 15935
> The other differences are in the expected range of a few percent.
> On some investigation it looks like 64bit contains the regexpr functions and
> other library functions, while the 32bit versions use the one from glibc.
> I assume that must be a (harmless) bug since the glibc version (2.5) is
> between 32bit and 64bit.
Thanks for reporting that. glibc-2.5's regex code probably still suffers
from the bug that makes it misbehave on 64-bit systems for strings
longer than 2^31 bytes. This has been fixed in gnulib's regex code since
glibc-2.3.5. So, coreutils works around it, along with any other project
that uses gnulib's regex module, by detecting the offending condition and
providing a working replacement. Here's the relevant part of m4/regex.m4:
/* Reject hosts whose regoff_t values are too narrow.
These include glibc 2.3.5 on hosts with 64-bit ptrdiff_t
and 32-bit int. */
if (sizeof (regoff_t) < sizeof (ptrdiff_t)
|| sizeof (regoff_t) < sizeof (ssize_t))
When that configure-run test program fails, those programs link with
the replacement regex functions from gnulib.
If you want to save space in those executables, and you don't think
there's a significant risk of malfunction[*], you can make coreutils
use the library code like this:
[*] Can you even get a 2GB-long string into expr?
I rarely use the regexp code in tac and nl, and use ptx even less
frequently. Personally, I'm not worried about csplit failing if/when
I run it on a file with such a long line -- I'll have other, more
immediate problems with the file, like getting that line into memory :)