[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering
From: |
Micah Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:35:42 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) |
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Micah Cowan <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Untrue, actually: _handling_ the signals would not handle them in the
>> exec'd child (for obvious reasons), but POSIX requires blocked signals
>> to remain blocked after an exec.
>
> trap "" is not about blocking a signal, but ignoring it.
Yeah, my terminology's apparently not so great today: "exec'd child" is
another goof (s/b "exec'd process").
--
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer...
http://micah.cowan.name/
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, (continued)
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Bob Proulx, 2007/06/07
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Phillip Susi, 2007/06/12
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Bob Proulx, 2007/06/12
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, John Cowan, 2007/06/12
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Phillip Susi, 2007/06/13
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Bob Proulx, 2007/06/13
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Phillip Susi, 2007/06/14
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Micah Cowan, 2007/06/14
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Phillip Susi, 2007/06/14
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering, Andreas Schwab, 2007/06/14
- Re: nohup feature request / Please fwd to Jim Meyering,
Micah Cowan <=