[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sort --compare-version
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: sort --compare-version |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:10:46 -0800 |
On Feb 6, 2008 10:59 AM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bruce Korb <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Yep. That's the reason for the "compare-" prefix. I didn't like
> > ``--compare-version-sort'' for some sort of reason, too. Ultimately,
> > someone pick another name if "compare-version" is aesthetically bad.
>
> How about making it --sort=KEYWORD, with KEYWORD in
> {general-numeric,month,numeric,random,version}?
Yep. That's _very_ nice. Just a little beyond the energy level I had at
the time. :) Thanks.
- Re: sort --compare-version, Bob Proulx, 2008/02/04
- Re: sort --compare-version, James Youngman, 2008/02/05
- Re: sort --compare-version, Bruce Korb, 2008/02/06
- Re: sort --compare-version, Andreas Schwab, 2008/02/06
- Re: sort --compare-version,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: sort --compare-version, Jim Meyering, 2008/02/06
- Re: sort --compare-version, Bob Proulx, 2008/02/06
- Re: sort --compare-version, Andreas Schwab, 2008/02/08
- Re: sort --compare-version, Jim Meyering, 2008/02/10
- Re: sort --compare-version, Andreas Schwab, 2008/02/18
- Re: sort --compare-version, Jim Meyering, 2008/02/20
- Re: sort --compare-version, Bauke Jan Douma, 2008/02/06
Re: sort --compare-version, Bob Proulx, 2008/02/06