Re: sort --batch-size non-merge bug

[Jim Meyering]

Bo Borgerson <address@hidden> wrote:
> If --batch-size is used with a non-merge sort (to govern the merge of
> temp files), and there is no --buffer-size set in conjunction, then the
> minimum SORT_SIZE will be enforced resulting in severe performance
> degradation.
>
> I've attached a fix for this bug, including a test that exercises it.
> I've also pushed to repo.or.cz.

Thanks for catching that.

Applied and pushed.