[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jul 2011 09:41:35 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 07/04/2011 03:08 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> But I notice that sed no longer supports `setbuf -i0`.
> This is because of 3a8e165a which discards the
> original stdin and instead fdopens() a new one
> to support reading in binary mode on windos.
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=sed.git;a=commit;h=3a8e165a
This seems to point to the fact that using freopen() to force binary
mode on stdin is the wrong approach, and that we may be better served by
using lower-level idioms that change the binary mode of the underlying
file descriptor without also altering stdin with unintended side-effects.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Bruno Haible, 2011/07/01
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Pádraig Brady, 2011/07/01
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Bruno Haible, 2011/07/03
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Bruno Haible, 2011/07/03
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Pádraig Brady, 2011/07/03
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Pádraig Brady, 2011/07/04
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/07/04
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs,
Eric Blake <=
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Pádraig Brady, 2011/07/05
- bug#8961: stdbuf has no effect on some programs, Eric Blake, 2011/07/05