[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9718: bugs in `date` command?
From: |
Bryan Lee |
Subject: |
bug#9718: bugs in `date` command? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:47:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Thus Eric Blake hast written on Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 07:59:40AM -0600, and,
according to prophecy, it shall come to pass that:
> On 10/11/2011 01:31 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>> Thank you for the report, however I don't see what's wrong.
>> I guess you meant "second wednesday" - which you probably expected
>> to display Oct 19th?
Exactly.
>> As 'second' is already used for the time unit 'second', it cannot
>> be used as an ordinal number for 2nd.
I see that now. I think I read the definition os "second" when I went
through the info page, but I totally missed the signifigence. Especially
since "third" worked.
> As currently coded in the grammar, this is correct. But if someone were
I agree.
Thank you Eric Blake and Bernhard Voelker for your assistance. I
appologize for my error.