[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:13:19 +0200 |
reopen 12301
thanks
Erik Auerswald wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:33:13AM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> On 08/29/2012 11:12 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> >> Can we be sure that 0x2fc12fc1 is used for all ZFS
>> >> implementations?
>> >
>> > If there end up being two or more magic numbers for the same file
>> > system (or ZFS variants going by new names), we'll adapt.
>>
>> Ok, that sounds good. Thanks.
>
> How can I check this magic number on a Solaris 10 system with ZFS?
> Neither GNU coreutils nor a C compiler installed. :-(
>
> $ uname -a
> SunOS demchpux 5.10 Generic_138888-08 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120
> $ df -n /
> / : zfs
> $ df -g /
> / (/ ): 131072 block size
> 512 frag size
> 0 total blocks 82144537 free blocks 82144537 available
> 82388038 total files
> 82144537 free files 67174412 filesys id
> zfs fstype 0x00000004 flag 255 filename length
Thanks for your interest.
If you have perl of python, you can have them call statvfs,
then simply run truss on the script and you'll see what
statvfs produces, one field of which should be an "fsid" member:
However, your query prompted me to build the latest on
a Solaris 10 system and see:
sol10$ ./stat --fo=%T -f /
zfs
sol10$ truss -v statvfs ./stat --fo=%T -f /
...
statvfs64("/", 0xFFBFFAA8) = 0
bsize=131072 frsize=512 blocks=117101360 bfree=92845257
bavail=92845257 files=93143101 ffree=92845257 favail=92845257
fsid=0x4010002 basetype=zfs namemax=255
flag=ST_NOTRUNC
fstr=""
...
Hmm... fsid=0x4010002.
That is definitely not the same number as what is now recorded in
stat.c, so this deserves more investigation:
case S_MAGIC_ZFS: /* 0x2FC12FC1 local */
return "zfs";
This also shows there is room for improvement.
(should print the hexadecimal FSID):
sol10$ ./stat --fo=%t -f /
?
This latter might deserve its own bug, but for now,
I've simply reopened the original ZFS-related bug.
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS, Raimonds Miltins, 2012/08/29
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/29
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/08/29
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/29
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/08/29
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS, Erik Auerswald, 2012/08/29
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS,
Jim Meyering <=
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/29
- bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/29