[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated syml
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir |
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:49:47 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 |
On 09/04/2012 11:46 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
> POSIX is portability standard -- it should not
> be regarded as a restrictive standard, unless not doing so would hinder
> portability. In effect, they are disallowing OS's to make extensions
> beyond
> what they allow in the newer standards...
That's where you are wrong. POSIX _does_ allow OS's to make extensions
beyond the standard.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., (continued)
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/03
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/04
bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir,
Eric Blake <=
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05