[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated syml
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:53:04 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 |
On 09/04/2012 10:46 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
> I would assert that the trailing "." shouldn't be stripped either.
If we were designing anew, I'd be inclined to agree with you.
But there are probably people expecting the standard behavior now,
and there's an argument for not departing from the standard
unless there's a good reason.
Here, if we can provide a command "rm -fr foo/" to do what you
want, then I hope it's merely a minor glitch that "rm -fr foo/."
doesn't do what you want. After all, the version without the
"." is easier to type, and it's more convenient with shells
that autocomplete, so the fact that POSIX requires failure for
the version with the "." shouldn't be that big a deal.
("rm -fr foo/" doesn't work right either, but we're
looking into that....)
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., (continued)
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/03
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/04
bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Eric Blake, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir,
Paul Eggert <=
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/05