[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is docu
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so. |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:42:15 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Linda Walsh wrote:
> ...
> > GNU needs to be clear their priorities -- maintaining software
> > freedom, or bowing down to corporate powers... POSIX isn't
>
> While POSIX is in general a very good baseline, no one here conforms
> blindly. If POSIX is wrong, we'll lobby to change it, or, when
> that fails, maybe relegate the undesirable required behavior to when
> POSIXLY_CORRECT is set, or even simply ignore it. In fact, over the
> years, I have deliberately made a few GNU tools contravene some aspects
> of POSIX-specified behavior that I felt were counterproductive.
>
> We try to make the tools as useful as possible, sometimes adding features
> when we deem them worthwhile. However, we are very much against changing
> the *default* behavior (behavior that has been that way for over 20
> years and that is compatible with all other vendor-supplied rm programs)
> without a very good reason.
Because I originally voted that this felt like a bug I wanted to state
that after determining that this has already been legacy system
historical practice for a very long time that I wouldn't change it
now. Portability of applications is more important.
This isn't a feature that could be working in a script for someone.
It isn't something that was recently removed that would cause a script
to break. A script will run now with the same behavior across
multiple different types of systems. I think we should leave things
unchanged.
Bob
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., (continued)
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/04
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/06
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so.,
Bob Proulx <=
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Alan Curry, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07