[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is docu
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so. |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:51:17 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 |
On 09/07/2012 03:30 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Not that I believe that, -- I just think most users aren't
> aware or don't care, but that would be the reasoning. I get it here,
> why would I expect someone who's job is to come up with lame rules that
> defy standard practice (last I looked they were proposing to ban "space"
> (as well as 0x01-0x1f) in file names).
You aren't looking very hard, then. The proposal currently being
considered by the Austin Group is a ban on newline (and newline only)
from file names, because that is the one and only character whose
presence in file names causes ambiguous output for line-oriented tools.
Forbidding space and most non-printing control characters was rejected
as impractical. And even with the proposed ban on newline, it is still
just that - a proposal, and not a hard rule, waiting for implementation
practice to see if it is even doable.
http://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=251
Read the whole thing. The original poster mentioned a much tighter
bound, but it was shot down, with the _only_ thing being left on the
table under current discussion is _just_ the limitation of newline.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., (continued)
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/05
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/06
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bob Proulx, 2012/09/06
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so.,
Eric Blake <=
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Alan Curry, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Alan Curry, 2012/09/07
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/08
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Alan Curry, 2012/09/08
- bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/08