Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-coreutils (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Sep 30 2012 12:12:44 -0400 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• bug#12542: [PATCH] du: avoid abort on systems for which ->me_type is not malloc'd, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/30
  • bug#12542: [PATCH] du: avoid abort on systems for which ->me_type is not malloc'd, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/30
    • bug#12542: [PATCH] du: avoid abort on systems for which ->me_type is not malloc'd, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/30
• bug#12530: nice(1) man page, bad wording, David Diggles, 2012/09/28
  • bug#12530: nice(1) man page, bad wording, Voelker, Bernhard, 2012/09/28
    • bug#12530: nice(1) man page, bad wording, Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/28
      • bug#12530: nice(1) man page, bad wording, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/28
      • Message not available
      • bug#12530: nice(1) man page, bad wording, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/28
• bug#12523: Solaris 10 "cp -p" returns unknown error on NFSv4 share, permissions preserve not work, Ryba, Lukas, 2012/09/26
  • bug#12523: Solaris 10 "cp -p" returns unknown error on NFSv4 share, permissions preserve not work, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/26
• bug#12505: Unknown colorls variable `rs', Rihan Haque, 2012/09/24
  • bug#12505: Unknown colorls variable `rs', Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/24
  • bug#12505: Unknown colorls variable `rs', Eric Blake, 2012/09/24
• bug#12498: tail: unrecognized file system, Marius Bjørnstad, 2012/09/24
  • bug#12498: tail: unrecognized file system, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/24
    • bug#12498: tail: unrecognized file system, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/30
• bug#12497: a bug for "man pwd", chenguolinnanjing, 2012/09/24
  • bug#12497: a bug for "man pwd", Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/24
  • bug#12497: a bug for "man pwd", Jim Meyering, 2012/09/29
• bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails, Georgiy Treyvus, 2012/09/24
  • bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/24
  • bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails, Alan Curry, 2012/09/24
    • bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails, Sven Joachim, 2012/09/24
      • bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails, Alan Curry, 2012/09/24
      • bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails, Sven Joachim, 2012/09/24
      • bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/25
  • Message not available
    • bug#12494: closed (Re: bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails), Georgiy Treyvus, 2012/09/25
      • bug#12494: closed (Re: bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails), Georgiy Treyvus, 2012/09/25
      • bug#12494: closed (Re: bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails), Eric Blake, 2012/09/25
      • bug#12494: closed (Re: bug#12494: 0 exit status even when chmod fails), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/26
• bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/22
  • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/22
    • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/22
  • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., g . esp, 2012/09/23
    • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/23
  • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/23
    • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/23
    • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/23
      • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/24
      • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/24
      • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Eric Blake, 2012/09/24
      • bug#12489: inconsistent output from 'dd' w/rt stats and suppression., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/24
• bug#12482: Feature Request: support for int, octal, and hex types in seq --format, Craig Sanders, 2012/09/20
  • bug#12482: Feature Request: support for int, octal, and hex types in seq --format, Voelker, Bernhard, 2012/09/21
    • bug#12482: Feature Request: support for int, octal, and hex types in seq --format, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/21
      • bug#12482: Feature Request: support for int, octal, and hex types in seq --format, Craig Sanders, 2012/09/21
• bug#12478: cat SEGV when I press Ctrl-Alt-SysRq-1 on text console, Rafal W., 2012/09/20
  • bug#12478: cat SEGV when I press Ctrl-Alt-SysRq-1 on text console, Alan Curry, 2012/09/20
    • bug#12478: cat SEGV when I press Ctrl-Alt-SysRq-1 on text console, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/30
• bug#12212: [patch] dd's help text contains superfluous word, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/18
  • bug#12212: [patch] dd's help text contains superfluous word, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/18
    • bug#12212: [patch] dd's help text contains superfluous word, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/18
      • bug#12212: [patch] dd's help text contains superfluous word, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/18
      • bug#12212: [patch] dd's help text contains superfluous word, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/18
      • bug#12212: [patch] dd's help text contains superfluous word, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/18
• bug#12461: unrecognized file system type 0xbacbacbc, Daniel Tschinder, 2012/09/17
  • bug#12461: unrecognized file system type 0xbacbacbc, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/19
    • bug#12461: unrecognized file system type 0xbacbacbc, Daniel Tschinder, 2012/09/22
      • bug#12461: unrecognized file system type 0xbacbacbc, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/23
      • bug#12461: unrecognized file system type 0xbacbacbc, Daniel Tschinder, 2012/09/23
• bug#12453: failed test suite on 64-bit debian squeeze, Laurence Maddox, 2012/09/16
  • bug#12453: failed test suite on 64-bit debian squeeze, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/16
• bug#12192: tr - bytes vs characters, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/15
• bug#12260: [patch] rm -d in coreutils 8.19, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/15
• bug#11950: cp: Recursively copy ordered for maximal reading speed, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/15
• bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Matei David, 2012/09/14
  • bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/14
    • bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Matei David, 2012/09/14
      • bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/15
      • bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/15
      • bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/16
      • bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/16
      • bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/16
      • bug#12445: ls --color does not color symlinks when not resolving them, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/16
• bug#12433: Slightly misleading documentation for cp -f, Reuben Thomas, 2012/09/13
• bug#6970: gnu cp problem, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
• bug#9921: ./configure coreutils 8.14 on oneiric ubuntu 64 bit errors - see config.log, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
• bug#10774: runcon'|, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
• bug#10799: mv on virtual Ubuntu, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
• bug#11164: reporting of bugs in lfs, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
• bug#11949: Symbolic links, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
• bug#12162: [date] wrong time returned from provided relative date description, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
• bug#12427: Why does OpenSuSE disabled the default of allowing multi-core use in Coreutils 'sort'??, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/12
  • bug#12427: Why does OpenSuSE disabled the default of allowing multi-core use in Coreutils 'sort'??, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/12
    • bug#12427: Why does OpenSuSE disabled the default of allowing multi-core use in Coreutils 'sort'??, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/12
      • bug#12427: Why does OpenSuSE disabled the default of allowing multi-core use in Coreutils 'sort'??, Eric Blake, 2012/09/12
  • bug#12427: Why does OpenSuSE disabled the default of allowing multi-core use in Coreutils 'sort'??, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/12
    • bug#12427: Why does OpenSuSE disabled the default of allowing multi-core use in Coreutils 'sort'??, Eric Blake, 2012/09/12
    • bug#12427: Why does OpenSuSE disabled the default of allowing multi-core use in Coreutils 'sort'??, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/12
• bug#12421: Issue of the cp on Ubuntu 10.10, owen . zhao, 2012/09/12
  • bug#12421: Issue of the cp on Ubuntu 10.10, Alan Curry, 2012/09/14
    • bug#12421: Issue of the cp on Ubuntu 10.10, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/15
• bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/09
  • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/09
    • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/09
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/09
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/09
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Bob Proulx, 2012/09/10
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/10
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/10
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok",, Alan Curry, 2012/09/10
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok",, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/10
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok",, Alan Curry, 2012/09/10
      • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok",, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/10
  • bug#12400: rmdir runs "amok", users "curse" GNU...(as rmdir has no option to stay on 1 file system)..., Bob Proulx, 2012/09/10
• bug#12365: Should cp -n return 0, when DEST exists?, Eric Blake, 2012/09/06
• bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/06
  • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/06
    • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/06
  • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/06
  • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
  • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/06
    • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] Writing unwritable files, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] bug#12366: Writing unwritable files, John Darrington, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] bug#12366: Writing unwritable files, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] bug#12366: Writing unwritable files, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] bug#12366: Writing unwritable files, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] bug#12366: Writing unwritable files, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12366: [gnu-prog-discuss] bug#12366: Writing unwritable files, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/06
• bug#12365: Incorrect return value of cp with no-clobber option, Anoop Sharma, 2012/09/06
  • bug#12365: Should cp -n return 0, when DEST exists?, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/06
    • bug#12365: Should cp -n return 0, when DEST exists?, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12365: Should cp -n return 0, when DEST exists?, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/06
  • Message not available
    • bug#12365: closed (Re: Should cp -n return 0, when DEST exists?), Anoop Sharma, 2012/09/07
• bug#12356: tail doesn't know vzfs, Jens Rosenboom, 2012/09/05
  • bug#12356: tail doesn't know vzfs, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
    • bug#12356: tail doesn't know vzfs, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
• bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/04
  • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/04
    • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/04
    • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/04
    • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Eric Blake, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/13
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/13
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/13
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/13
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/13
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/15
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/16
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/16
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/17
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/17
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/17
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/17
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/17
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/18
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/18
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/18
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/24
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/30
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/30
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/30
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/30
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/17
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/14
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/14
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/14
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/14
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/14
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Paul Eggert, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Niels Möller, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Niels Möller, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Niels Möller, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Paul Eggert, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/09
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/09
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Torbjorn Granlund, 2012/09/10
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Jim Meyering, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12350: Composites identified as primes in factor.c (when HAVE_GMP), Pádraig Brady, 2012/09/07
• bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/02
  • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bob Proulx, 2012/09/02
    • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/03
  • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/03
    • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bob Proulx, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is, Alan Curry, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is, Alan Curry, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Voelker, Bernhard, 2012/09/03
    • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Andreas Schwab, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Voelker, Bernhard, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bob Proulx, 2012/09/06
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Alan Curry, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Alan Curry, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/08
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Alan Curry, 2012/09/08
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/08
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/08
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/07
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/08
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Jim Meyering, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Eric Blake, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/04
  • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
    • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Eric Blake, 2012/09/04
    • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/05
      • bug#12339: [PATCH] rm: avoid bogus diagnostic for a slash-decorated symlink-to-dir, Linda Walsh, 2012/09/05
  • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/06
    • bug#12339: Bug: rm -fr . doesn't dir depth first deletion yet it is documented to do so., Linda Walsh, 2012/09/06
  • bug#12339: Gnu rm, changed only recently (4-5 years), and didn't follow letter of posix...(statement follows), Linda Walsh, 2012/09/12
    • bug#12339: Gnu rm, changed only recently (4-5 years), and didn't follow letter of posix...(statement follows), Eric Blake, 2012/09/12
      • bug#12339: Gnu rm, changed only recently (4-5 years), and didn't follow letter of posix...(statement follows), Eric Blake, 2012/09/12
      • bug#12339: Gnu rm, changed only recently (4-5 years), and didn't follow letter of posix...(statement follows), Linda Walsh, 2012/09/12
      • bug#12339: Gnu rm, changed only recently (4-5 years), and didn't follow letter of posix...(statement follows), Linda Walsh, 2012/09/13
• bug#12336: test bug, Bala Murugan, 2012/09/02
  • bug#12336: test bug, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/02
    • bug#12336: test bug, Bala Murugan, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12336: test bug, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/04
      • bug#12336: test bug, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
• bug#12334: [patches] two tiny textual fixes for 'touch', Benno Schulenberg, 2012/09/02
  • bug#12334: [patches] two tiny textual fixes for 'touch', Jim Meyering, 2012/09/02
    • bug#12334: [patches] two tiny textual fixes for 'touch', Benno Schulenberg, 2012/09/02
      • bug#12334: [patches] two tiny textual fixes for 'touch', Jim Meyering, 2012/09/02
      • bug#12334: [patches] two tiny textual fixes for 'touch', Benno Schulenberg, 2012/09/03
      • bug#12334: [patches] two tiny textual fixes for 'touch', Jim Meyering, 2012/09/03
• bug#12322: coreutils-8.1{8, 9} with /etc/mtab as real file, df/total-unprocessed fail, df/no-mtab-status is skipped, g . esp, 2012/09/01
  • bug#12322: coreutils-8.1{8, 9} with /etc/mtab as real file, df/total-unprocessed fail, df/no-mtab-status is skipped, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/09/02
    • bug#12322: coreutils-8.1{8, 9} with /etc/mtab as real file, df/total-unprocessed fail, df/no-mtab-status is skipped, g . esp, 2012/09/02
      • bug#12322: coreutils-8.1{8, 9} with /etc/mtab as real file, df/total-unprocessed fail, df/no-mtab-status is skipped, g . esp, 2012/09/30

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc