bug#13394: Misalignment for "seq -w"

[Erik Auerswald]

Hi,

On 01/09/2013 11:34 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 01/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote:
> > There are the following problems with the -w parameter of the seq tool:
> > [...]
>
> Hmm, according to the TEXI manual, the FIRST number should also use
> a fixed point decimal representation when the -w option is used:
> [...]
> But that leaves the question open if there's a reason for this.
> I.e. if it's just documented behavior, a requirement of some
> standard or due to compatibility reasons.

That seems to be just documented behavior, since seq is not standardized 
by POSIX and other seq implementations ([1],[2],[3]) don't document 
this. On the contrary, a common example is 'seq -w 0 .05 .1'.

This example works fine with GNU seq:

$ seq -w 0 .05 .1
0.00
0.05
0.10

Even when counting to negative numbers:

$ seq -w 0 -.05 -.1
00.00
-0.05
-0.10

Starting with a negative number with a fractional step size breaks equal 
width for non-negative numbers:

$ seq -w -1 .5 1
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0

$ seq --version | head -n1
seq (GNU coreutils) 8.13

HTH,
Erik

[1] http://man.cat-v.org/unix_8th/1/seq
[2] http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/1/seq
[3] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=seq&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE