[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19218: Inconsistent spacing of output of "ls --full-time [file argum
From: |
Michael Salem |
Subject: |
bug#19218: Inconsistent spacing of output of "ls --full-time [file argument]" |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:49:02 +0000 |
To wrap up: I reported inconsistent output format from ls as a bug;
others have made informative comments, to the effect that the output
format of ls is not specified in detail so there is no program error;
it is user error. I think the essential points are, going from the
general to the particular:
1. Don't rely on undocumented behaviour in general.
2. If you do rely on undocumented output format, you're less likely
to have trouble using whitespace as a delimiter rather than rely on
absolute character positions. (In my particular case whitespace would
have been OK, although it's been pointed out that ls date format,
which I was assuming, is not guaranteed anyway, and ls is not the
appropriate tool.)
3. The output format of ls depends upon its content, in particular it
adjusts the lengths of all lines according to the longest one, so it
is not incorrect for runs of ls which would produce overlong lines to
eliminate some space characters. Thus, the line for file cp in /etc,
in the output of <ls --full-time cp> can legitimately be spaced
differently than for a listing of all the files in the directory,
some of them with long names.
I wouldn't have distributed a script like the one I was trying to use
without more care, but had thought it would be safe when using the
same version of ls on the same system, and always in the same
directory!
Thanks to all, and I hope this conversation might be of use to anyone
repeating my mistake.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#19218: Inconsistent spacing of output of "ls --full-time [file argument]",
Michael Salem <=