[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23110: seq apparent bug
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
Subject: |
bug#23110: seq apparent bug |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:40:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
reopen 23110
thanks
On 04/07/2016 11:46 AM, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> I understand that this issue is not a bug. But it wouldn't be also not a
> bug if coreutils would behave like BSD:
>
> $ seq 1 0 10 ; echo $?
> seq: zero increment
> 1
Ah, okay: as there's prior art in the BSDs [0], the attached
proposes the same for GNU coreutils.
[0] http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-release-7/src/usr.bin/seq/seq.c
Have a nice day,
Berny
0001-seq-do-not-allow-0-as-increment-value.patch
Description: Text Data
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Ruediger Meier, 2016/04/06
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/04/07
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Ruediger Meier, 2016/04/07
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug,
Bernhard Voelker <=
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Pádraig Brady, 2016/04/08
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/08
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Ruediger Meier, 2016/04/08
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/08
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Ruediger Meier, 2016/04/09
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/04/09
- Message not available
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/04/14
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Pádraig Brady, 2016/04/14
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/04/14