bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#41563: Possible bug with 'sort -Vr' version sorting


From: Danie de Jager
Subject: bug#41563: Possible bug with 'sort -Vr' version sorting
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 09:11:15 +0200

Thank you for your response! I'll use it accordingly.

On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 08:48, Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 2:07:32 PM CEST Danie de Jager via GNU coreutils
> Bug Reports wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use sort -Vr to sort version numbers. I noticed this discrepancy on
> > the latest kernel version from Centos 7.8.
> >
> > command to get output:
> > # ls -t /boot/vmlinuz-* | sed "s/\/boot\/vmlinuz-//g" | grep -v rescue
> >
> > | sort -Vr
> >
> > 3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64
> > 3.10.0-1127.8.2.el7.x86_64
> > 3.10.0-1062.18.1.el7.x86_64
>
> It is the underscore in the .x86_64 suffix what breaks the version compare
> algorithm.  If you replace the underscore by an alphabetic character, it
> sorts as you expect:
>
> # ls -t /boot/vmlinuz-* | sed "s/\/boot\/vmlinuz-//g" | grep -v rescue | \
>     sed 's/x86_64/x86X64/' | sort -Vr | sed 's/x86X64/x86_64/'
>
> 3.10.0-1127.8.2.el7.x86_64
> 3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64
> 3.10.0-1062.18.1.el7.x86_64
>
> Kamil
>
> > I'd expect the middle value to be the highest version number. Is this
> > by design or a bug? If it is a bug please let me know if I must log it
> > somewhere.
> >
> > Version details:
> > # sort --version
> > sort (GNU coreutils) 8.22
> > Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
> > <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>. This is free software: you are free to
> > change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted
> > by law.
> >
> > Written by Mike Haertel and Paul Eggert.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Danie de Jager
>
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]