[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-cpio] Re: Destination directory patch
From: |
P J P |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-cpio] Re: Destination directory patch |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:33:50 +0530 (IST) |
--- On Fri, 23/7/10, Sergey Poznyakoff <address@hidden> wrote:
> No, it does. When it is not set, cpio operates the
> way it did before.
I think even when `change_directory_option' is set, cpio operates the way it
did before because the output_name.ds_sting starts with directory_name.
> It is not required to be absolute.
Yeah, but if change_directory_option is NULL, directory_name will be treated
like an absolute path, even if if it is not absolute.
> Yes, it is intended.
It is intended that `change_directory_option' and `directory_name' have
different values?
---
Regards
-Prasad
PS: Please don't send me html/attachment/Fwd mails
Re: [Bug-cpio] Re: Destination directory patch, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2010/07/23