[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
getopt and Solaris 10
From: |
Derek Price |
Subject: |
getopt and Solaris 10 |
Date: |
Thu, 05 May 2005 13:34:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
Apparently Solaris 10 includes a getopt.h and appears to be GNU getopt
by all the tests in getopt.m4. Unfortunately, it doesn't support "+" as
the first character of the option string. The original report is here:
<https://ccvs.cvshome.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=248>.
I'm assuming that GNULIB is still avoiding AC_TRY_RUN since it doesn't
work when cross-compiling? I've asked Matthias (the bug reporter, CC'd)
if he could find some difference between Solaris 10's getopt and GNU
getopt that could be detected at compile time. The alternative would be
always using the GNULIB getopt when installed.
Regards,
Derek
- getopt and Solaris 10,
Derek Price <=
- Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/05
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/05
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Matthias Kurz, 2005/05/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Matthias Kurz, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Karl Berry, 2005/05/11
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Matthias Kurz, 2005/05/09