bug-ddrescue
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-ddrescue] ddrescue vs dd_rescue


From: andrew zajac
Subject: Re: [Bug-ddrescue] ddrescue vs dd_rescue
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 06:20:09 -0700 (PDT)



--- On Mon, 5/3/10, Thomas Strub <address@hidden> wrote:

From: Thomas Strub <address@hidden>
Subject: [Bug-ddrescue] ddrescue vs dd_rescue
To: address@hidden
Received: Monday, May 3, 2010, 4:15 PM

Hi,

I am not very familiar with Linux etc., but I have found that grml-medium contains dd_rescue and not ddrescue as supposed:
http://grml.org/files/release-2010.04-medium/dpkg_get_selections

It seems there is quite a difference between ddrescue and dd_rescue:
http://www.toad.com/gnu/sysadmin/index.html#ddrescue

So at the moment I would prefer ddrescue to copy my failed RAID5 disks and I think it would be good to include it with grml.

Just wanted to let you know.

Regards,
Thomas



_______________________________________________
Bug-ddrescue mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue
Hi Thomas.

You would need to ask the developers at gmrl to do that.

Ubuntu-Rescue-Remix, however, includes Gnu ddrescue along with a full command-line shell and the best free/libre open-source data recovery tools available.

http://ubuntu-rescue-remix.org






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]