[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in
From: |
Pedro Alves |
Subject: |
bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:40:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
On 6/26/20 11:58 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>> The issue for me is that the "gdb Summary" tally did not
>> mention the aborted testcase. I would like to see something
>> like this instead:
>>
>> # of expected passes 208
>> # of nasty OMG FIX! tcl errors 1
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Your UNRESOLVED is of course better than the status quo.
>>
>
> UNRESOLVED is a step in the right direction, but I agree that more is needed.
> We are somewhat limited by POSIX, which does not define a separate result
> type for "test case crashed" and seems to roll that into UNRESOLVED, although
> POSIX appears to require a testsuite to have a strictly-defined set of tests
> and that a run must produce results for exactly all of them, which requires
> information DejaGnu does not normally have about the running testsuite. So,
> while UNRESOLVED is needed, we could also maintain a separate count of
> UNRESOLVED-due-to-crash, or simply store away the error
> message/errorCode/errorInfo tuples and emit them a second time at the end of
> the run, also easy in Tcl 8.
I'm not sure how much is POSIX compliance important these days. I would hope
that that
would not limit DejaGnu's development and limit its potential to be more
usable. Even
if POSIX compliance is important, I would think that that could be put behind
a --posixly_correct option, and/or POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variable, like
other
GNU tools do:
https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Non_002dGNU-Standards.html
Or conversely, we could have a --gnu mode, though I would say that a GNU tool
should behave in GNU mode by default.
I really don't buy that adding different result types is an issue, as
hinted earlier. We've actually done it in GDB, for a loooong while. We
have distinct XFAIL vs KFAIL output messages show up in the .sum file (though
those aren't distinguished in the summary file, doing so would be convenient,
hence I see that as a GDB testsuite bug).
And just very recently, we've added PATH and DUPLICATE output messages,
and those do show up in the summary:
# of expected passes 89593
# of unexpected failures 547
# of expected failures 146
# of known failures 104
# of untested testcases 20
# of unresolved testcases 5
# of unsupported tests 97
# of paths in test names 1 <<<<<
# of duplicate test names 370 <<<<<
I would think that even these two would be useful to have in
DejaGnu proper for all testsuites.
v1/rationale -
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167847.html
v3/final version -
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/168105.html
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, (continued)
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/17
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/23
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/23
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/24
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/24
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/25
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/25
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/26
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/26
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/26
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case,
Pedro Alves <=
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/27
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/27
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Rob Savoye, 2020/06/26
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/26
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/27
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/27
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/27
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/27
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/06/30
- bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case, Pedro Alves, 2020/06/30