Re: bug in ed-0.3/ed-0.4

[Andrew L. Moore]

Paul wrote:
] And having a 'q' not quit would probably mess up both people
] and scripts if they happened to be running ed with more than
] one file listed on the command line, and expecting to actually
] just edit the first one and quit (perhaps not ever having noticed
] before that other files were named in argv[]).
] 
] 'q' should not mean 'next' - that just seems kind of broken to me.

Scripts are not affected.  My thinking is that `q' emphasizes the serial
nature of multi-file support - that going to the next file means the current
buffer is lost.  Anyhow, just a thought...
-AM