[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name.
From: |
Dmitry V. Levin |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name. |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 01:40:16 +0300 |
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:57:40PM +0100, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Trying to get findutils to build on cygwin, I needed to apply following
> patch. It now builds (and runs) fine for me.
>
>
> 2005-02-02 Bas van Gompel <address@hidden>
>
> * find/pred.c (pred_exec): Use base_name, not basename.
> (pred_ok): Ditto.
Thank you for report.
However, in this case neither basename nor base_name should be used, see
https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3701#comment1
for details.
--
ldv
pgpokLS7vhdKY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/02
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name.,
Dmitry V. Levin <=
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/03
- Re: [patch] find/pred.c: basename versus base_name., James Youngman, 2005/02/03
- Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, James Youngman, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Bas van Gompel, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/05
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, James Youngman, 2005/02/06
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, Dmitry V. Levin, 2005/02/06
- Re: Bugfix: Failure of -execdir to process arguments at depth 0, James Youngman, 2005/02/06