[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ARG_MAX
From: |
Leslie P. Polzer |
Subject: |
Re: ARG_MAX |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:59:33 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.4 |
> Thanks. I've copied the address@hidden mailing list, since
> we're discussing design changes. I hope you don't mind.
I never do :)
> My main concern is the overhead of figuring out the ARG_MAX value.
> [...]
> To be honest, it mostly comes down to performance.
Alright, I am convinced. Let's implement it this way, then.
If there's sufficient time, the linear approach can be substituted
by a binary one then (while still doing it only on-demand, of course).
It would be even more efficient to store the last known value that
worked somewhere. Perhaps /var/cache would be a good idea?
Leslie
- Re: ARG_MAX, James Youngman, 2007/04/25
- Re: ARG_MAX,
Leslie P. Polzer <=