[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #20263] DEC Alpha OSF/1 cc does not support comparing function poin
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
[bug #20263] DEC Alpha OSF/1 cc does not support comparing function pointer types with <= or > |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:18:00 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070310 Iceweasel/2.0.0.3 (Debian-2.0.0.3-2) |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?20263>
Summary: DEC Alpha OSF/1 cc does not support comparing
function pointer types with <= or >
Project: findutils
Submitted by: jay
Submitted on: Tuesday 06/26/2007 at 08:17
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: jay
Originator Name: Nelson H. F. Beebe
Originator Email: address@hidden
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: None
Fixed Release: None
_______________________________________________________
Details:
In ISO C, function pointers can be compared for equality with == but not the
< > operators are not defined for them. Therefore this operation is not
allowed by the native C compiler on DEC Alpha OSF/1:
cc -std -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../gnulib/lib -I../lib -I../gnulib/lib
-I../intl \
-DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -I/usr/local/include -ieee
\
-I/usr/local/include -c tree.c
[...]
cc: Error: tree.c, line 980: In this statement, "pl1->fn" and "pl2->fn"
cannot be compared with a relational operator. (norelational)
assert(pl1->fn <= pl2->fn);
------^
cc: Error: tree.c, line 995: In this statement, "pc1->fn" and "pc2->fn"
cannot be compared with a relational operator. (norelational)
else if (pc1->fn > pc2->fn)
-----------^
make[3]: *** [tree.o] Error 1
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?20263>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #20263] DEC Alpha OSF/1 cc does not support comparing function pointer types with <= or >,
James Youngman <=