[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: findutils 4.6.0 v. Tru64 (strftime() v. "%F"?)
From: |
Steven M. Schweda |
Subject: |
Re: findutils 4.6.0 v. Tru64 (strftime() v. "%F"?) |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2017 00:43:47 -0500 (CDT) |
Tru64 is not alone. On an old HP-UX system, it's different but still
sub-ideal:
dy# findutils-4.6.0/find/find . -name fred -printf '%C+\n'
May+16:18:11.0000000000
There, "man strftime" says:
[...]
The following directives are provided for backward compatibility with
the directives supported by date(1) and the ctime(3C) functions.
These directives may be removed in a future release. It is
recommended that the directives above be used in preference to those
below.
[...]
%F Locale's full month name (use %B instead).
[...]
So, again, trusting the non-GNU strftime() seems unwise.
dy# uname -a
HP-UX dy B.11.11 U 9000/785 2012616114 unlimited-user license
dy# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.2/configure
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.2 (GCC)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven M. Schweda address@hidden