[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Missing bits of regexprops.texi

From: James Youngman
Subject: Re: Missing bits of regexprops.texi
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 22:37:24 +0000

Thanks for reporting this bug.   The attached patches, which I plan to
submit shortly, fix the problem.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
> The documentation as generated for findutils refers to "ed" syntax,
> but does not define it. ("posix-basic" is given as a synonym for
> "ed".)
> --
> https://rrt.sc3d.org

This email is intended solely for the use of its addressee, sender,
and any readers of a mailing list archive in which it happens to
appear.   If you have received this email in error, please say or type
three times, "I believe in the utility of email disclaimers," and then
reply to the author correcting any spellings (and, optionally, any
incorrect spellings), accompanying these with humorous jests about the
author's parentage.   If you are not the addressee, you are
nevertheless permitted to both copy and forward this email since
without such permissions email systems are unable to transmit email to
anybody, intended recipient or not.  To those still reading by this
point, the author would like to apologise for being unable to maintain
a consistent level of humour throughout this disclaimer.  Contents may
settle during transit.  Do not feed the animals.

Attachment: 0001-regexprops-fix-dangling-reference-to-the-ed-regular-.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: 0002-regexprops-don-t-mention-regex-dialects-we-re-not-go.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]