[patch #9705] make ftsfind honour the -ignore_readdir_race option

[Bernhard Voelker]

Update of patch #9705 (project findutils):

             Open/Closed:                  Closed => Open                   

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #3:

[re-opeing the issue]

Hmm, I don't get this error, and the '-D search' output looks different for
me,
and I ran it many times:

consider_visiting (early): '.': fts_info=FTS_D , fts_level= 0,
prev_depth=-2147483648 fts_path='.', fts_accpath='.'
consider_visiting (late): '.': fts_info=FTS_D , isdir=1 ignore=1 have_stat=1
have_type=1 
consider_visiting (early): './5': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=0 fts_path='./5', fts_accpath='5'
consider_visiting (late): './5': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./5
consider_visiting (early): './7': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./7', fts_accpath='7'
consider_visiting (late): './7': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./7
consider_visiting (early): './8': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./8', fts_accpath='8'
consider_visiting (late): './8': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
removed '1'
removed '2'
removed '3'
removed '4'
removed '6'
removed '9'
removed '10'
find deleted: ./8
consider_visiting (early): './9': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./9', fts_accpath='9'
consider_visiting (late): './9': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./9
consider_visiting (early): './2': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./2', fts_accpath='2'
consider_visiting (late): './2': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./2
consider_visiting (early): './10': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./10', fts_accpath='10'
consider_visiting (late): './10': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./10
consider_visiting (early): './1': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./1', fts_accpath='1'
consider_visiting (late): './1': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./1
consider_visiting (early): './3': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./3', fts_accpath='3'
consider_visiting (late): './3': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./3
consider_visiting (early): './6': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./6', fts_accpath='6'
consider_visiting (late): './6': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./6
consider_visiting (early): './4': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, fts_level= 1,
prev_depth=1 fts_path='./4', fts_accpath='4'
consider_visiting (late): './4': fts_info=FTS_NSOK, isdir=0 ignore=0
have_stat=0 have_type=1 
find deleted: ./4
consider_visiting (early): '.': fts_info=FTS_DP, fts_level= 0, prev_depth=1
fts_path='.', fts_accpath='.'
consider_visiting (late): '.': fts_info=FTS_DP, isdir=1 ignore=0 have_stat=1
have_type=1 
find exit status: 0
find time: 55.07

I'm on ext4.  Do you have a special environment? Or a tweaked reproducer?
Thanks.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?9705>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/