[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-freedink] Re: FreeDink ArchLinux package
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
[Bug-freedink] Re: FreeDink ArchLinux package |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:24:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi,
I pushed an official release:
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/freedink/freedink-1.08.20080920.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/freedink/dfarc-3.2.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/freedink/freedink-data-1.08.20080920.tar.gz
You can check how other distros are packaged if that can help:
http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/
(namely debian/ fedora/*.spec and gentoo/)
Let me know how this goes :)
--
Sylvain
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:02:29AM +0000, Petteri Tolonen wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>> I'm sorry, that I haven't made a complete freedink-package-collection
>>> (dfarc, data and engine together) for archlinux yet, but I was kind
>>> of waiting your new "totally free" freedink-data. I have also
>>> thought about making two data-packages: one with the original game
>>> data and the other with new freedink-data, so everyone could choose
>>> which one they want. What do you think about this?
>>>
>>
>> Well, the original data isn't redistributable. The whole point of
>> freeing (a subset of) the Dink data is so it could be packaged. Also
>> I'd rather foster contribution on freedink-data, which can then be
>> used as a standard base, rather than entice people into using unclear
>> data that I'm trying to get rid of :)
>>
>>
> Ok. I'll package the freedink-data.
>
>>>> PS: any progress with the finnish DFArc translation? :)
>>>>
>>> I translated it one night somehow, but I haven't had the time to
>>> check it through and finish it properly, because I have been busy
>>> with school and some other things.
>>>
>>
>> OK. Do you think it can already be used in its current state, though?
>>
>
> I read the translation file quickly through and I think it's usable.
> There are a few incomplete translations, because I couldn't come up with
> anything that would look good. However, I would like to test it in
> dfarc, so I can see how all parts fit in the context.
- [Bug-freedink] Re: FreeDink ArchLinux package, Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/16
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Bug-freedink] Re: FreeDink ArchLinux package,
Sylvain Beucler <=
- [Bug-freedink] DFarc "make install" problem/question/finnish translation., Petteri Tolonen, 2008/09/22
- [Bug-freedink] Re: DFarc "make install" problem/question/finnish translation., Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/22
- [Bug-freedink] Re: DFarc "make install" problem/question/finnish translation., Petteri Tolonen, 2008/09/22
- [Bug-freedink] Re: DFarc "make install" problem/question/finnish translation., Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/22
- Message not available
- [Bug-freedink] Re: DFarc "make install" problem/question/finnish translation., Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Bug-freedink] Re: DFarc "make install" problem/question/finnish translation., Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/26
- Message not available
- [Bug-freedink] Re: About package dependencies.., Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/27
- Message not available
- [Bug-freedink] Re: free 'swing' and 'punch' sounds..., Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/27
- Message not available
- [Bug-freedink] Re: free 'bhit' and 'burn' sounds..., Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/27
- [Bug-freedink] Re: DFarc "make install" problem/question/finnish translation., Sylvain Beucler, 2008/09/28