[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] posix flag bug?
|
From: |
arnold |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] posix flag bug? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:30:05 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 |
Ed Morton <address@hidden> wrote:
> thanks for the quick action. I see do_lint and do_traditional being
> tested in the fix - does that cover the presence of the "--posix"
> argument too or is there a missing do_posix variable?
There is a do_posix flag, but when --posix is supplied do_traditional
also becomes true, so it's enough to check that flag.
Thanks,
Arnold