Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2

[arnold]

Hi Andy.

> > The change is probably right. But it should be commented as to what's
> > going on and why the order is important.
>
> Good point. How's this comment?
>
>                         /* N.B. We must call assign() before unref, since
>                          * we may need to copy $n values before freeing the
>                          * $0 buffer.
>                          */

Other than I like

                        /*
                         * Comment start here ...
                         */

sorts of comments, it's fine.

Please push the combined patch and test cases to gawk-4.2-stable.

I will try to find time to look at the other two mentioned cases.

Thanks,

Arnold