[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2

From: Andrew J. Schorr
Subject: Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:25:56 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 09:05:26AM -0500, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:53:14AM -0500, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> > Combined patch attached. Eric -- can you please confirm this fixes your 
> > issue?
> > 
> > Arnold -- does this look right to you? I haven't chased down all the nuances
> > of what this assign function is doing...
> Note: we may have a similar ordering problem at debug.c:1301.

So don't we need the attached patch to match the new ordering in interpret.h?
I'm not sure how to test this...

> And at interpret.h:373, I'm not sure how Op_field_spec_lhs really works and
> what's going on with the field_assign value...

Still a mystery to me.


Attachment: debug.patch
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]