Re: [bug-gawk] Overflow to Infinity

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:47:22 -0600
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
>         address@hidden
> 
> Your C output distinguishes -nan from +nan but apparently the use of
> signbit() doesn't work as I expect on MinGW.

I will look closer at that.

> Eli, I'd appreciate your reviewing things in depth and deciding if you wish
> to produce a patch or not.

I will, I'm just too busy these days, so this will have to wait for a
while until I have enough free time to dedicate to this issue.