[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: indirect function call issues (2)
From: |
Denis Shirokov |
Subject: |
Re: indirect function call issues (2) |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 22:36:51 +0200 |
>
> Is there any other way to run a script on gawk? =)
>
> Another question on a completely different topic — look:
>
> Example:
>
> BEGIN {
> length(A[1])
> print "A[1] : " typeof(A[1])
>
> length(B)
> print "B : " typeof(B)
> }
>
> Outputs:
>
>
> A[1] : untyped B : unassigned
>
> In the first case, length() does not make A[1] a string or an array,
> leaving A[1] in the *untyped* state, whereas in the second case, for some
> reason, it makes the neutral B *unassigned*. Is this correct in light of
> the new (but long-awaited!) gawk feature allowing uninitialized subscripts
> in arrays without automatically making them *unassigned*?
>
> Is such behavior correct?
>
> Regards,
> Denis
>
- indirect function call issues (2), Denis Shirokov, 2025/01/14
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/15
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), arnold, 2025/01/15
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/15
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), Denis Shirokov, 2025/01/15
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/15
- Re: indirect function call issues (2),
Denis Shirokov <=
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/15
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), arnold, 2025/01/16
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), mekanofox, 2025/01/15
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), arnold, 2025/01/16
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), mekanofox, 2025/01/16
- Re: indirect function call issues (2), mekanofox, 2025/01/16
Re: indirect function call issues (2), Denis Shirokov, 2025/01/15