[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Incorrect definition of fpos_t ?
From: |
Pennifold, John R |
Subject: |
Incorrect definition of fpos_t ? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 17:11:32 +0100 |
Hi ,
I'm running Red Hat Linux 7.2 and am trying to port some C programs from
DG/UX. I'm hitting a problem with a seemingly incorrect definition (via
stdio.h to _G_config.h) at the compile phase. In other Unix systems fpos_t
is *long, but in this version it's a structure (_G_fpos_t). I've found lots
of postings and messages concerning this problem in the past but I can't
find a solution. RH7.2 incorporates glibc 2.2.4 and gcc 2.96. Can you
help?
Many thanks
John Pennifold
Tel: 01483 786127
email: address@hidden
********************************************************************************************
" This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and
is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for
the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or
use
this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ".
********************************************************************************************
- Incorrect definition of fpos_t ?,
Pennifold, John R <=