[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cost of popen()

From: Hideki IWAMOTO
Subject: Re: cost of popen()
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:49:34 +0900

Hi. Yamaguchi san.

Please tell how you think about function layer plugin. 

Should function layer plugin support dynamic linking mechanisms other than 
Is the size of distribution allowed to be increased by including libltdl?

The size of tarball made from CVS HEAD is 841080 bytes. 
After the attached patch is applied, it increases to 1403206 bytes. 

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:54:10 +0900, Shigio Yamaguchi wrote...
> > > Does this mean stopping supporting plug-in parser?
> > 
> > It shouldn't if the parser API is defined well. You could even support
> > dynamic objects for plug-in parsers.
> You mean function layer plug-in?
> I agree. We should make it a library, if it is possible in reasonable cost.
> But the priority is not so high, I think.
> If the flexibility is important, should we take command layer plug-in
> rather than function layer plug-in?
> --
> Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
> PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3

Hideki IWAMOTO  address@hidden

Attachment: 20100213-function-layer-plugin-parser.patch
Description: Binary data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]