[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cost of popen()

From: Shigio YAMAGUCHI
Subject: Re: cost of popen()
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:58:53 +0900

> Should function layer plugin support dynamic linking mechanisms other than 
> dlopen?

I think it is preferable.

> Is the size of distribution allowed to be increased by including libltdl?
> The size of tarball made from CVS HEAD is 841080 bytes. 
> After the attached patch is applied, it increases to 1403206 bytes. 

No problem.

By the way, why does the function layer plugin use exuberant-ctags?
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden>
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]