[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: symbol catenation and montgomery
From: |
phr-2000 |
Subject: |
Re: symbol catenation and montgomery |
Date: |
29 Sep 2000 09:26:10 -0000 |
The claim is that the modexp routines in both PGP and OpenSSL are
faster than GMP. And that Zmodexp and MIRACLE are even faster, on
Pentium hardware. I haven't used OpenSSL, but at least I have it
installed, so perhaps I could try doing some benchmarks.
If you want to benchmark OpenSSL, the simplest way is to just type
openssl speed rsa1024
on the command line. This runs 1024-bit RSA operations (with CRT) for
20 seconds (encryption and decryption 10 seconds each) and prints the
time per operation.
- symbol catenation and montgomery, Niels Möller, 2000/09/27
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/28
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Niels Möller, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery,
phr-2000 <=
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29