[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GMP Inputs
Re: GMP Inputs
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 11:15:32 +0200
At 08:23 +1000 2001/04/26, Kevin Ryde wrote:
>> - As for the inaccuracy (inverted value of precision) of floating and fixed
>> point numbers, I think that a fairly correct mathematical way would be to
>> use differentials of the operations involved to compute the new inaccuracy.
>> That is, unless the user specifically requests a round-off.
>I think mpfr (www.mpfr.org) had ideas for an interval arithmetic along
>those lines, made possible by the exact rounding in the mpfr floats.
There seems to be a balance: On the one hand, one wants to add sufficiently
many digits in order to not decrease the accuracy, on the other hand, one
does not want to add too many digits for the sake of speed.
I saw that Gerardo Ballabio uses the idea to let the LHS side of an
assignment to decide the precision. This gives rise rather complicated
implementation solutions. (But I used the same kind of idea in another
context in the form of a dynamic "double dispatch" implementation.)
One advantage with this precision computation is that one avoid that.
But I how no idea of how practical it would be for your GMP library.
* Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:address@hidden>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
GMP ceil/floor/trunc, Hans Aberg, 2001/04/24
- Re: GMP MacOS PPC assembler, (continued)
- GMP parser, Hans Aberg, 2001/04/26
- Re: GMP parser, Kevin Ryde, 2001/04/29
- Re: GMP parser, Hans Aberg, 2001/04/30
- GMP C++ wrap, Hans Aberg, 2001/04/25
- GMP Inputs, Hans Aberg, 2001/04/25
- Re: GMP Inputs, Kevin Ryde, 2001/04/25
- Re: GMP Inputs,
Hans Aberg <=