[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnupedia] Re: Classification difficulty and incompletene ss
From: |
Duncan Lock |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnupedia] Re: Classification difficulty and incompletene ss |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:47:32 -0000 |
DocBook, Dublin Core metadata, RDF: this kind of thing has been done
lots of times before and there are standards out there that we ought to be
looking at using. My XML skeleton was just a suggestion to get some concrete
discussion going.
I don't know much about DocBook (I know what it is I just haven't
used it, although I plan to.) You sound like you do - would it be possible/
desirable to use DocBook as it stands for encyclopaedia articles, in your
opinion?
Dunc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
> Behalf Of Tore Morkemo
> Sent: 18 January 2001 1:22
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Re: Classification difficulty and
> incompletene ss
>
> Have a look at the <author>, <authorgroup> in DocBook.
>
> http://docbook.org/tdg/html/author.html
> http://docbook.org/tdg/html/authorgroup.html
>
>
> We could use these from DocBook:
>
> <honorific>Dr.</honorific>
> <firstname>Richard M.</firstname>
> <surname>Stallman</surname>
>
> If we identify firstname and surname at this point we could make
> the icelandic index at a later point..
>
> Tore Morkemo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnupedia mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupedia
>