[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation
From: |
Hector Facundo Arena |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 23:52:40 -0300 |
Well, I don't think we should start thinking on classification issues... even
on making a list of topics. We have to concentrate on the article submission
method. If it has enough scalability, we'll can do whatever we want with it
on the future.
On Tuesday 23 January 2001 20:45, you wrote:
> Tom Chance <address@hidden> writes:
> > So it seems to me that we would need some sort of classification up
> > asap.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > It is silly to suggest that any classification we decide on now will
> > be relevant in 20 years, or even four weeks, obviously. So it is
> > important that any classifications we impose now can be quickly
> > changed when it suits us.
>
> Yes, which is why putting the classification information in (separate)
> databases is a good idea and why putting classification information in
> the article repository is a bad idea.
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, (continued)
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/24