[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: no need for where-is to list losing completions

From: Dan Jacobson
Subject: Re: no need for where-is to list losing completions
Date: 22 Jan 2001 09:19:17 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7

[Eli, your messages had no References header here on netnews. This
spoils my thread tracking.]

>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

Eli> On 21 Jan 2001, Dan Jacobson wrote:

>> May I suggest that the list of completions for C-h w (where-is) be
>> limited to only those commands that have bindings.

Eli> This is against the purpose of "C-h w".  If you remove commands
Eli> that aren't bound, users might think that an unbound command
Eli> doesn't exist.

Naw, like I said last message, 

Dan> If I want to know about the others I could use C-h f
Dan> (describe-function).

and TAB around in there.
http://www.geocities.com/jidanni Tel886-4-25854780 e-mail:restore .com. 積丹尼

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]