[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: user-load-path (was: Re: Emacs 21 NEWS file (was Re: [OT?] Gnu Emacs
Re: user-load-path (was: Re: Emacs 21 NEWS file (was Re: [OT?] Gnu Emacs is dying?)(fwd))
20 Jun 2001 18:16:40 +0200
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7
address@hidden (Dave Love) writes:
> I don't think it's acceptable or necessary for a Custom interface to
> require uses of such a variable to be changed, if that's the idea.
Of course it is not necessary, it is just a small matter of
programming to create a more complex and fragile solution.
> There should be a standard method for augmenting customized
Please note that the closest to that we have on the Lisp level is:
(add-to-list 'package-foobar new-element))
A rather complex mechanism for a non programmer. Doing simple
customizations shouldn't require more Lisp expertise than
(setq package-foobar some-simple-value)
I therefore believe having user options with complex default values
are a bad idea, even ignoring customize. Modifying 'TeX-command-list'
which is has a complex default value is what causes most users
problems in AUC TeX.
I much prefer customize being used as an argument to keep user options
simple, than as an excuse to create overly complex user options.