[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Futile bug reports?
From: |
deja8501 |
Subject: |
Re: Futile bug reports? |
Date: |
8 Aug 2001 23:04:06 -0700 |
rms@gnu.org (Richard Stallman) wrote in message
news:<200108082315.RAA11829@aztec.santafe.edu>...
> The absence of a response does not mean that your bug report is
> futile. The people who work on GNU Emacs have more work than they can
> handle, so I have asked them to use their time fixing more bugs,
> rather than use it sending responses.
>
> Meanwhile, venting your anger with terms like "FSF Emacs" is
> not likely to make us want to communicate with you more.
I didn't want to sound angry or offensive. English is not my mother
tongue therefore I sometimes cannot express my thoughts properly. I
wanted to be constructive, that's why I suggested setting up a bug
tracking system
I'm what you can call a free software enthusiast. I use FSF Emacs all
the time and I want to make it better with my bug reports.
I think that alienating your users with statements like yours above
(the one about communication) does not help making the free software
movement more successful.
Tom
- Futile bug reports?, deja8501, 2001/08/08
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Charles Sebold, 2001/08/08
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/08
- Re: Futile bug reports?,
deja8501 <=
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, deja8501, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Gunnar Evermann, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Peter S Galbraith, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Peter S Galbraith, 2001/08/14