bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: keymap display inconsistency in help


From: Stephen Berman
Subject: Re: keymap display inconsistency in help
Date: 01 May 2002 13:27:01 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Kevin Rodgers <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Richard Stallman) writes:
[I <address@hidden> had written:]
> >     If a major mode keymap is defined using (make-keymap), then in both
> >     the mode description and the function description of the mode the key
> >     bindings are displayed in ASCII order; but if the keymap is defined
> >     using (make-sparse-keymap), then the key bindings are displayed in
> >     reverse ASCII order.
> > 
> > Would you please send precise test cases?
> > You say "are displayed", but that is not clear:
> > displayed by what?  With precise test cases,
> > I would know the answer.

Whoops, my report was sent by mistake (I composed it offline and
pressed C-c C-c thinking that would send it to my Gnus queue for later
editing, but I didn't realize that M-x report-emacs-bug doesn't
interact with Gnus by default.  I assume it went into my sendmail
queue and was sent without my knowledge the next time I logged on.)
In fact I prepared a test case, which I append below.

> I think this is the same complaint discussed in the second part of
> this article:
> 
> From: address@hidden (Kevin Rodgers)
> Subject: Re: C-x r refers to both rectangle and register...
> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 17:03:32 -0700
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> References: <address@hidden>
> Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug

Hm, there you wrote:

> > I do C-x C-h and things are out of order, no matter what my LC_* env
> > variables are,
> [...]
> Because ctl-x-4-prefix is a sparse keymap, ordered from newest to oldest
> bindings.

I assume by "newest to oldest" you mean the same thing Stefan Monnier
wrote in the current thread:

> With a sparse keymap the order is determined by the order in which
> the bindings were added to the table.

But this is not the behavior I observed, as the appended test case
demonstrates -- that is, unless the bindings are added to the table in
reverse ASCII order, and not in the order they are defined in by the
mode-map defvar.  BTW, this also happens in Emacs 20.7.

--Steve Berman

Attachment: testcase
Description: test case for key bindings display


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]