[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 14:37:51 +0300 |
On 9 Jul 2002, David Kastrup wrote:
> > I think Dired doesn't automatically refresh the directory view as a
> > matter of principle. It's not something specific to
> > dired-do-hardlink.
>
> So if you rename a file from within dired, dired displays the same
> file name? If you change its permissions from within dired, it
> displays the same permissions? If you move it or delete it from
> within dired, it stays there as if it existed before? If you copy to
> some other directory under dired, the files don't arrive in the
> display there?
>
> Could you substantiate your claim?
The claim is that Dired never queries the filesystem after any operation,
it just manipulates the buffer contents.
- dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Dan Jacobson, 2002/07/08
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Dan Jacobson, 2002/07/10
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/10
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/10