[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gmt-manpages: man (l) vs man (1) vs. e.g. emacs' M-x man

From: Dan Jacobson
Subject: gmt-manpages: man (l) vs man (1) vs. e.g. emacs' M-x man
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 05:08:06 +0800

Package: gmt-manpages
Version: 3.4-1
Severity: minor

$From: Paul Wessel <address@hidden>
$To: Dan Jacobson <address@hidden>
$>on those manpages SEE ALSO sections, l is used where 1 should be,
$>e.g.: fitcircle(l). This breaks emacs' M-x man.  
$But that is true of all GMT man pages as they are supposed to go in 
$man/manl.  Perhaps the emacs macro is broken...

No, on debian they are put into man1 and there is no manl. I am
sending this to the debian gmt-manpages package maintainer to see what
he wants to do about this, if anything.

True, emacs' M-x man command could look in more places if it can't find
it where it wants, maybe.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.20-k7 #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5

-- no debconf information

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]