[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnuplot vs. emacs' compile command

From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker
Subject: Re: gnuplot vs. emacs' compile command
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:16:54 +0200 (MET DST)

On Tue, 20 May 2003, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Hans-Bernhard Broeker <address@hidden> writes:
> |> I'll see if it helps to have gnuplot_x11 fclose(stderr) as it
> |> enters the -persist state.
> freopen to /dev/null might be preferrable, so that stderr remains valid.

Yep, that seems like a better plan --- gnuplot_x11 can be built to
optionally output execution trace information to stderr, which had better
not break completely.

I tried both, and both apparently do the trick.  Unless someone on the
gnuplot development list has an objection, this change to gnuplot will
be checked in.

Hans-Bernhard Broeker (address@hidden)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]