emacs (21.3 and CVS) crashes immediately (new build on SPARC/Solaris 8)

[Andreas Florath]

     Hello!

     I cannot get the emacs to run under Solaris 8.  It crashes
directly after startup with a Segmentation Fault:

> emacs
Fatal error (11)Segmentation Fault
>


     I tried the versions 21.3 and the todays (20040223) cvs snapshot
with the same result.


System Environment:

uname -m = sun4u
uname -r = 5.8
uname -s = SunOS
uname -v = Generic_108528-24

binutils 2.14 20030612
gcc version 3.3.2 (using GNU ld)
coreutils 5.0

Configure call:
./configure --with-x-toolkit=athena --with-xpm --with-jpeg --with-tiff 
--with-gif --with-png --with-x


The backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0  0xfee1f890 in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
#1  0xb52dc in fatal_error_signal (sig=11) at emacs.c:391
#2  <signal handler called>
#3  0xff2a34d4 in XtInitializeWidgetClass () from /usr/lib/libXt.so.4
#4  0xff2ab100 in _XtCreateWidget () from /usr/lib/libXt.so.4
#5  0xff2aaff8 in XtCreateWidget () from /usr/lib/libXt.so.4
#6  0x9e678 in x_window (f=0x6a1600, window_prompting=0, 
minibuffer_only=0) at xfns.c:2660
#7  0x9f990 in Fx_create_frame (parms=-1604705480) at xfns.c:3462
#8  0x11fcec in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0xffbeeb44) at eval.c:2728
#9  0x14e260 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=-4265152, vector=2126240, 
maxdepth=536870911) at bytecode.c:689
#10 0x1200ac in funcall_lambda (fun=-2145357540, nargs=1, 
arg_vector=0xffbeecec) at eval.c:2915
#11 0x11fb94 in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0xffbeece8) at eval.c:2785
#12 0x14e260 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=-4264728, vector=2465868, 
maxdepth=536870911) at bytecode.c:689
#13 0x1200ac in funcall_lambda (fun=-2145017872, nargs=1, 
arg_vector=0xffbeee94) at eval.c:2915
#14 0x11fb94 in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0xffbeee90) at eval.c:2785
#15 0x14e260 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=-4264304, vector=2461916, 
maxdepth=536870911) at bytecode.c:689
#16 0x1200ac in funcall_lambda (fun=-2145021872, nargs=0, 
arg_vector=0xffbef03c) at eval.c:2915
#17 0x11fb94 in Ffuncall (nargs=0, args=0xffbef038) at eval.c:2785
#18 0x14e260 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=-4263880, vector=2594880, 
maxdepth=536870911) at bytecode.c:689
#19 0x1200ac in funcall_lambda (fun=-2144889992, nargs=0, 
arg_vector=0xffbef1ec) at eval.c:2915
#20 0x11fb94 in Ffuncall (nargs=0, args=0xffbef1e8) at eval.c:2785
#21 0x14e260 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=-4263448, vector=2589028, 
maxdepth=536870911) at bytecode.c:689
#22 0x1200ac in funcall_lambda (fun=-2144894804, nargs=0, 
arg_vector=0xffbef308) at eval.c:2915
#23 0x11ff78 in apply_lambda (fun=-2144894804, args=540983296, 
eval_flag=1) at eval.c:2837
#24 0x11efb8 in Feval (form=2588844) at eval.c:2138
#25 0x11de9c in internal_condition_case (bfun=0xb80ec <top_level_2>, 
handlers=541067768, hfun=0xb7d64 <cmd_error>) at eval.c:1333
#26 0xb813c in top_level_1 () at keyboard.c:1281
#27 0x11d9e0 in internal_catch (tag=541056936, func=0xb8104 
<top_level_1>, arg=540983296) at eval.c:1094
#28 0xb8050 in command_loop () at keyboard.c:1242
#29 0xb7acc in recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:959
#30 0xb7c1c in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:1015
#31 0xb6778 in main (argc=0, argv=0xffbef914) at emacs.c:1682


Note: for me it looks a little bit suspicious that the 'fun' are
negative?!? (starting in frame 23)

If you have some hints or need some more information, feel free to
ask.


Best regards

Andreas Florath