Re: Bug in clone-indirect-buffer and clone-indirect-buffer-other-window

[Kevin Rodgers]

Jay Bingham wrote:
> Personally, I would prefer to have some way to differentiate between
> buffers which contain different files with the same name and buffers
> that actually point to the same file without having to enter a name
> for the clone.  I also prefer the numeric indicator to follow the
> existing buffer name.  Realizing the the same function is likely used
> to generate the file names I am still willing to suggest that perhaps
> the `[N]' or `{N}' designators could be used to indicate a cloned
> buffer as opposed to an automatically generated file name.

Perhaps you can use (require 'uniquify) to help get what you want -- see
the uniquify-buffer-name-style and uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p
options.

--
Kevin Rodgers