bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection


From: Thien-Thi Nguyen
Subject: Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:42:15 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux)

() Joe Wells <address@hidden>
() Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:15:00 +0100

   With the above definition, I still get (reproduce-bug) returning
   ((#<dead frame address@hidden 0xa2ae808> . t))
   instead of nil.

crazy idea...  have you tried doing this experiment under ratpoison?
for the record:

 $ ratpoison.working-2007-05-04 --version
 ratpoison 1.4.2-CVS (built May  4 2007 11:37:01)
 $ emacs --version
 GNU Emacs 22.0.97.4
 Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 GNU Emacs comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
 You may redistribute copies of Emacs
 under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
 For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING.
 $ free
              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
 Mem:        516616     419580      97036          0      80808     187968
 -/+ buffers/cache:     150804     365812
 Swap:      1510068          0    1510068


i recall emacs21 had weak-hash problems, but i think those were
fixed in emacs22.  such problems when hacking EDB were one reason
i transitioned away from being an emacs21 holdout (about two years
ago).

thi




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]